Determination of Beam Quality and Dosimetric Verification of 6MV and 10MV Photon Beam of an Elekta Synergy Platform Linear Accelerator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61424/ijans.v3i3.551Keywords:
Absorbed dose to water, Beam quality index (BQI), Mega voltage photon beam, Tissue phantom ratio (TPR), Percentage depth dose (PDD).Abstract
Beam quality verification is a fundamental aspect of radiotherapy commissioning and quality assurance, ensuring that photon beams from medical linear accelerators correspond to their nominal energies and comply with international dosimetry protocols. For megavoltage beams, indices such as percentage depth dose (PDD) at 10cm, tissue phantom ratio at depths of 10cm and 20cm (TPR20,10 ), and quality conversion factor kQ, Q0, are used to characterize beam quality. Accurate measurement of these parameters is essential to achieving consistent dose delivery and maintaining patient safety. This study aims to determine and verify the beam quality of 6MV and 10MV photon beams from Elekta Synergy linear accelerator for treatment plan quality assurance. Beam quality measurements were performed in water in a 3D water phantom at 100cm source-to-chamber distance (SCD) of 100cm and a field size of 10cm x 10cm at the chamber plane. A calibrated cylindrical Farmer type ionization chamber (30010) connected to a calibrated PTW UNIDOS electrometer (60731) was used to obtain depth-dose readings, the kQ, Q0 value were then evaluated using the IAEA TRS 398 TPR20,10 method. Measurements were taken at depths of 20cm and 10cm beneath the water surface, and at three different polarities of +300, +150, and -300 polarities on the electrometer. For the 6MV photon beam, the kQ, Q0 value was 0.993, TPR20,10 was 0.67, PDD(10) was 66.38% and the absorbed dose to water at Zmax was 0.9941cGy/MU and for the 10MV photon energy, the kQ, Q0 value was 0.983, TPR20,10 was 0.73, the PDD was 74.8% and the absorbed dose to water at Zmax was 1.004cGy/MU, these values are consistent with international reference standards. Beam quality verification confirmed that the Elekta Synergy linear accelerator delivers accurate 6MV and 10MV photon beams in compliance with TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398. Routine quality checks remain essential to ensure precise dose delivery and optimize radiotherapy outcomes.
Downloads
References
Brevitt, B. (2018). Beam quality measurement and verification of a C-series linear accelerator. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Practice, 1(1), 105.
Coeytaux, K., Bey, E., Christensen, D., Glassman, E. S., Murdock, B., & Doucet, C. (2015). Reported radiation overexposure accidents worldwide, 1980–2013: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0118709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118709
International Atomic Energy Agency. (1994). What is radiation therapy? International Atomic Energy Agency. Retrieved on 18th July, 2024, from https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-is-radiation-therapy
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (1976). Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of X or gamma rays: Radiotherapy procedures (ICRU Report No. 24). ICRU Publications.
Katzmark, C. J., Purdy, J. A., Biggs, P. J., Bowers, C., Edgar, D., Downs, W., Benedick, A. F., Khan, F., Morgan, P., Robert, M., Jatinder, P., Isaac, I. R., Thorson, T., Svensson, G., & Ting, J. (1993). Medical accelerator safety considerations: Report of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 35. Medical Physics, 20(4), 1261–1275.
Obinna, C., Pistenmaa, D., Simeon, C., Ubah, F., Nandul, N., Rasaaq, O., Ige, T., Coleman, N., & Manjit, D. (2020). Overcoming challenges in providing radiation therapy to patients with cancer in Nigeria and experience in the National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria. JCO Global Oncology, 6, 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00034.
Pearce, J. A. D., & Bass, G. A. (2010). Determination of beam quality index, TPR20/10, on the NPL Elekta linac. Acoustics & Ionising Radiation Division, National Physical Laboratory. ISSN 1754-2952.
Sharma, S. D. (2008). Quality of high-energy X-ray beams: Issues of adequacy of routine experimental verification. Journal of Medical Physics, 33(1), 1–2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Robert Patrick, Umaru Ibrahim, Samson D. Yusuf, Idris M. Mustapha, Abdullahi A. Mundi, Hephzibah Umorem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.