Effect of Problem-Based Learning on the Academic Performance and Perceptions of TVET Students in Nomenclature of Inorganic Compounds

Clinton Appiah Kodom

doi:10.61424/ijans.v4i1.725

Authors

Clinton Appiah Kodom School of Graduate Studies, University of Education, Winneba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61424/ijans.v4i1.725

Keywords:

Problem-Based Learning, TVET, Inorganic Compounds, Academic Performance, Student Perceptions, Gender Equity

Abstract

Students in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) institutions in Ghana often struggle to master and apply IUPAC nomenclature for inorganic compounds, partly due to limitations of traditional lecture-based instruction. This study examined the effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) on students’ performance and perceptions in naming inorganic compounds, including potential gender differences. A double-group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was used with 85 second-year TVET students from two institutions in Kpando Municipality (experimental = 45; control = 40). The experimental group received an eight-week PBL intervention, while the control group received conventional lectures. Data were collected using the Inorganic Compound Nomenclature Proficiency Test (ICNPT, KR-20 = 0.87) and a Student Perception Questionnaire (SPQ, Cronbach’s α = 0.91). Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, Welch’s t-test, and Cohen’s d for effect size were used for analysis. Results indicated that students in the PBL group significantly outperformed the control group (t(83) = 12.29, p < 0.05, d = 2.71). No significant gender differences were observed in the experimental group (Welch’s t = 1.316, p > 0.05). Students also reported positive perceptions of PBL, citing increased engagement, confidence, collaboration, and problem-solving skills. The study concludes that PBL enhances academic performance, conceptual understanding, and equitable learning outcomes, while positively influencing students’ perceptions. These findings support integrating PBL into TVET chemistry curricula and providing teacher professional development to promote learner-centered, problem-oriented instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68(1), 52–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199301000-00012

Baah, P., & Anthony-Krueger, J. (2012). Senior high school students’ understanding and challenges in naming inorganic compounds. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(5), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200123x

Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. Jossey-Bass.

Barrows, H. S. (2002). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Journal of Medical Education, 53(1), 31–36.

Boniface, A., et al. (2020). Active learning strategies in TVET science classrooms. Journal of Technical Education Research, 15(2), 45–59.

Camp, W. G. (1996). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 1(1), 38–44.

Duch, B., Groh, S., & Allen, D. (2001). The power of problem-based learning: A practical “how to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Stylus Publishing.

Edens, K. M. (2000). Preparing problem solvers for the 21st century: The role of problem-based learning. College Teaching, 48(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550009595875

Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

Kaufman, D. (1998). Curriculum planning for problem-based learning. Medical Education, 32(5), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00238.x

King, A. (2008). Structuring the classroom to promote active learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, R. P. Barrows, & P. L. Levine (Eds.), Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education (pp. 23–38). Springer.

Major, C. H., & Palmer, B. (2001). Assessing the effectiveness of problem-based learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 72(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2001.11778947

Palincsar, A. S., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (1999). Designing collaborative learning contexts. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543874

Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge University Press.

Rhem, J. (1998). Problem-based learning: An introduction. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 7(2), 1–5.

Rochelle, J. (1996). Cognitive apprenticeship and learning communities. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 119–138). Springer.

Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. Instructional Science, 27(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003082410469

Shore, R., Shore, B., & Broggs, K. (2004). The impact of problem-based learning on student engagement and learning. Journal of Learning Development, 6(1), 15–27.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walker, A., Leary, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2018). Problem-based learning: A meta-analysis of student outcomes across disciplines. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-0