The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Competitive Advantage of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Jordan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61424/rjbe.v4i3.960Keywords:
Digital economy, competitive advantage, small and medium-sized enterprises, digital transformation, Jordan.Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of the digital economy on the competitive advantage of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Jordan on a quantitative basis by applying the partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) method, which was used to collect and analyze survey data from 309 SMEs. Key areas of the digital economy studied were digital infrastructure, e-commerce adoption, digital payment systems, digital transformation and advanced digital technologies. The results show that digital infrastructure, advanced digital technologies, e-commerce adoption, and digital transformation are positively associated with competitive advantage with the highest positive coefficient being for digital infrastructure (β = 0.519, p < 0.001), followed by advanced digital technologies (β = 0.158, p = 0.004), e-commerce adoption (β = 0.142, p = 0.045), and digital transformation (β = 0.128, p = 0.007). Digital payment systems, on the other hand, failed to show a statistically significant impact (β = 0.014, p = 0.706). The structural model had an acceptable level of variance for competitive advantage (R² = 0.682) and had excellent predictive relevance (Q² = 0.667). The results support the Resource Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT) in that digital capabilities are indeed valuable strategic resources to improve the competitiveness of SMEs. The study comes at a time of great need for empirical evidence when it comes to the relative contribution of different dimensions of the digital economy toward generating competitive advantage, as this topic is missing from the literature on SME digitalization in the Jordanian context. The conclusions provide implications for both policy makers and SME managers, with the policy implications being to focus on investments in digital infrastructure and the managerial to strategically use advanced digital technologies to enhance innovation, operation efficiency, and market responsiveness. This study methods bring together several aspects of the digital economy in the context of a developing economy, adding to the existing digital transformation literature and offering practical recommendations to improve the competitiveness of SMEs.
References
Alharafsheh, M. (2023). The impact of business strategy on competitive advantage and performance of small & medium enterprises in Jordan. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 8(6), 2.
Alkhawaldeh, B. Y., Kalyebara, B., Abuoliem, N., Kalbouneh, N. Y., & Al-Zeaud, H. A. (2026). Digital economy, macroeconomic conditions and economic growth in Jordan: An empirical time-series analysis. Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy, 14(2), 84-121. https://doi.org/10.18080/jtde.v14n2.1419
Alkhawaldeh, B., Jaran, F. Z., Al-Shakri, K. S., Almahameed, H., & Taha, I. A. B. (2024). The influence of competitive intelligence on sustainable competitive advantage in Jordanian telecommunications companies: Mediating Role information sharing. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.37380/jisib.v14.i1.2488
Almtiri, F., Othman, R., & Al-Bsheish, M. (2021). E-commerce adoption and SME performance in Jordan. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 22(3), 189-206.
Al-Satel, R. A. (2026). The Reality of Digital Transformation for Small and Medium Enterprises: Achievements and Challenges (The Case of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan). Enhancing Business Efficiency Through Technology: Sustainability, CSR, and Governance, 1053-1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15820-8_86
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bianchini, M., & Sancho, M. L. (2025). SME digitalisation for competitiveness: The 2025 OECD D4SME Survey. OECD SME and entrepreneurship papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/197e3077-en
Boone Jr, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. The Journal of extension, 50(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA.
Bukht, R., & Heeks, R. (2017). Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. Development Informatics working paper, (68).
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Department of Statistics Jordan. (2023). Statistical yearbook 2022. DOS.
DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fang, T. M., Ahmad, N. H., Halim, H. A., Iqbal, Q., & Ramayah, T. (2024). Pathway towards SME competitiveness: Digital capability and digital business model innovation. Technology in Society, 79, 102728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102728
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage publications limited.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
Gonzalez-Varona, J. M., López-Paredes, A., Poza, D., & Acebes, F. (2024). Building and development of an organizational competence for digital transformation in SMEs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.01615. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.01615
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research methods in applied linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British journal of applied science & technology, 7(4), 396-403.
Kane, G. (2019). The technology fallacy: people are the real key to digital transformation. Research-technology management, 62(6), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2019.1661079
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information systems journal, 28(1), 227-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292. Nyhan, RC, and HA Marlowe.(1997). Development And Psychometric Properties Of The Organizational Trust Inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
OECD. (2021). The digital transformation of SMEs. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bdb9256a-en
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of management review, 46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
Resnik, D. B. (2015, January). What is ethics in research & why is it important.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS GmbH.
Saputra, M. H., Utomo, M. N., Ariansyah, K., Wismayanti, Y. F., & Ansyah, R. H. A. (2024). Small and medium-sized enterprises dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage: The mediating effect of digitalization. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 12(3), 41-67.
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Tapscott, D. (1996). Six themes for new learning from: the digital economy: promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. Educom Review, 31, 52-54.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of business research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
World Bank. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of COVID-19. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1897-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bashar Younis Alkhawaldeh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
