The Feminist Stylistics Analysis of Representation of Agency in Educated

Authors

  • Souad Faisal Hasan Al-Khakani Department of English, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq
  • Dunya Muhammed Miqdad Ijam Department of English, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61424/ijah.v3i1.400

Keywords:

Chiasmus, parallelism, irony, metaphor, simile, agency, feminist stylistics, qualitative and quantitative analysis

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide a feminist stylistic analysis of how agency is portrayed in  Westover's book, Educated. Using an eclectic linguistic model that combines Leech and Short's (2007) figures of speech and tropes with Mills's (1995) phrase and sentence-level framework, as well as Jeffries's (2010) examination of parallelism and chiasmus, the study explores how agency is linguistically constructed and negotiated within the text. Metaphor, simile, personification, irony, parallelism, schemas, and chiasmus are among the figures of speech that are examined in this approach. The study examines how these stylistic strategies create and convey female agency in the memoir using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The quantitative analysis finds patterns and frequencies that reinforce the systematic nature of these linguistic choices, while the qualitative study offers deep insights into how these stylistic devices work to reveal resistance, self-definition, and transformation. The findings demonstrate how Westover highlights the narrator's growth of selfhood and resistance to imposed identities through the use of figurative language and grammatical patterns. The study comes to the conclusion that Westover's memoir advances feminist literature by expressing complex depictions of female empowerment, identity, and resiliency through deliberate and multi-layered stylistic choices.

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.

Anderson, L., & Hall, S. (2018). Autobiography. Routledge.

Biriotti, M., & Miller, N. (Eds.). (1993). What is an author? Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109

Cameron, D. (2003). Gender and language ideologies. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 447–467). Blackwell.

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Jeffries, L. (2010). Literary analysis and style: A stylistic approach to English literature. Palgrave Macmillan.

Lazar, M. M. (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.

Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.

Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistics. Routledge.

Stanley, L. (1992). The auto/biographical I: The theory and practice of feminist auto/biography. Manchester University Press.

Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered discourses. Palgrave Macmillan.

Talbot, M. (2010). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Toolan, M. (2012). Language, text and context: Essays in stylistics. Routledge.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.

Westover, T. (2018). Educated: A memoir. Random House.

Wales, K. (2014). A dictionary of stylistics (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26

How to Cite

Al-Khakani, S. F. H., & Ijam, D. M. M. (2025). The Feminist Stylistics Analysis of Representation of Agency in Educated. International Journal of Arts and Humanities , 3(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.61424/ijah.v3i1.400