Sustainable Operations Management - A Comparative Study of the Circular Economy Practices in Manufacturing

Authors

  • Kaniz Fatema Grand Canyon University, USA
  • Munira Akter Mitu Trine University, USA
  • Sohel Mollick Washington University of Science Technology (WUST), USA
  • Nayema Zaman Urmi United Commercial Bank PLC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61424/rjbe.v4i1.646

Keywords:

Sustainable Operation Management, Circular Economy, ESG Performance Manufacturing Industry, Leadership Diversity, and Corporate Sustainability Metrics

Abstract

Sustainable operations management has gained prominence in the world's industrial strategy, particularly in the manufacturing industry, due to the apprehension of the resources and the environment that the world is experiencing. Practices of circular economy (CE) with their focus on reuse, recycling, and remanufacturing, and low consumption provide a structural transition out of the conventional linear model of take-make-dispose. This study is a comparative research paper based on the analysis of the sustainable manufacturing practices using data about the 100 most sustainable corporations. The aim is to assess how the major international manufacturing corporations are applying the principles of the circular economy to their manufacturing process and governing systems. This paper lists some important data amongst the dataset, such as sustainability revenue percent, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) ratings, CEO compensation ratios, and measures of leadership diversity like women in the executive management and board representation. These variables are used as proxies of circularity, social responsibility, and ethical governance. Filtered data is refined on the basis that only corporations that deal with manufacturing industries are covered, including industries dealing with electronics, waste management, and materials manufacturing. The analysis of descriptive analytics and visualizations (bar charts, scatter plots, and box plots) provides evidence of a lot of differences in circular economy performance across the manufacturing sub-sectors. The waste management and electronics companies increase the percentage of revenue on sustainability and have better ESG ratings, whereas many companies need to improve the gender diversity situation. There are also analytical findings indicating that there might be a relationship between inclusive leadership and a high level of performance in sustainability. The results show that although most manufacturing companies in the world are on the path to becoming circular, the amount of implementation is still variable and tends to vary with the industry, even geographical region, and policy maturity within the company. The challenges relate to technological constraints, an unbalanced regulatory framework, and investments in the sphere of circular infrastructure and disclosures. The contribution of this study to the scholarship is the presentation of empirical, comparative information on the practice of the circular economy in the manufacturing industries using a global perspective. It also provides strategic solutions on how sustainability performance can be improved by associating executive compensation with ESG targets, encouraging diversity at the leadership level, and incorporating circularity in designing the lifecycle of products. This study accentuates the importance of sustainable operating management in contributing to the realization of world climate objectives, enhancing firm responsibility, and long-threatened industrial stability.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-07

How to Cite

Fatema, K., Mitu, M. A., Mollick, S., & Urmi, N. Z. (2026). Sustainable Operations Management - A Comparative Study of the Circular Economy Practices in Manufacturing. Research Journal in Business and Economics, 4(1), 01–25. https://doi.org/10.61424/rjbe.v4i1.646