Milder Than Expected: Real-World Endocrine Toxicity Profile of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Eastern Algeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61424/ijmhr.v4i3.971Keywords:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors, endocrine toxicity, dysthyroidism, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, atezolizumab, immune-related adverse events, real-world data, Eastern AlgeriaAbstract
The recent introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in Algeria in late 2024 has transformed the therapeutic landscape for multiple malignancies. While endocrine immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are well-documented globally, real-world data concerning their clinical presentation and severity in the Algerian population remain scarce. This study aims to report the initial experience of endocrine toxicity management following the introduction of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors across a broad spectrum of cancers. We conducted an observational, real-world analysis within a medical oncology department in Eastern Algeria, enrolling patients initiated on ICI therapy since late 2024. The cohort comprised 84 patients distributed across various tumor types and regimens: 60 received pembrolizumab (23 triple-negative breast cancer, 17 non-small cell lung cancer, 9 renal cell carcinoma [RCC], 8 melanoma, 3 gastric cancer); 19 received nivolumab (5 pancreatic cancer, 4 urothelial carcinoma, 3 head and neck cancer, 5 RCC, 2 gastric cancer); 3 received avelumab (RCC); and 2 received atezolizumab (hepatocellular carcinoma). While various potential toxicities were monitored, particular attention was dedicated to endocrine side effects, which mandated the active involvement of endocrinologists in this surveillance framework. All toxicities were graded according to CTCAE v5.0 criteria. Endocrine irAEs were observed within the cohort, with dysthyroidism representing the most frequent manifestation and the primary driver for endocrinological referral. Strikingly, the clinical severity of these endocrine toxicities was notably lower than the profiles typically reported in the international literature. The majority of events were low-grade (CTCAE Grade 1-2), allowing for symptomatic hormonal substitution without necessitating ICI discontinuation. No high-grade (Grade 3-4) endocrinopathies, such as fulminant hypophysitis or adrenal crisis, were documented in this preliminary cohort. In this initial real-world experience from Eastern Algeria, the use of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and atezolizumab across various localizations demonstrates a manageable endocrine safety profile, with toxicities manifesting at a lesser severity than expected. These findings support a favorable risk-benefit ratio; however, the specific impact on thyroid function underscores that ongoing multidisciplinary surveillance—actively integrating endocrinologists—remains imperative to ensure prompt management and treatment continuity.
References
Abdel-Rahman O, Fouad M (2019). A meta-analysis of the incidence and relative risk of endocrine adverse events in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Endocr Relat Cancer. 26(6):359-368. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-19-0031
Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BF, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM (2022). Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 40(17):1904-1926. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02488
Byun DJ, Cho CE, Kim TM, Lee JW, Kim YH, Park YJ (2023). Endocrine adverse events related to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 9(8):1128-1136. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.1782
de Filette J, Andries A, Steyaert S, Rooryck V, Vanderschueren S, Tournel K, (2021). Endocrine adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 106(8):2279-2290. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab152
Faje AT, Sullivan R, Lawrence D, Bhatt RS, Kambadakone A, Limaye A (2026). Ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis: a detailed longitudinal analysis in a large cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 101(7):2591-2598. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-1410
Fallahi P, Dalla Verde L, Elia G, Di Bari F, Materazzi G, Marchi S (2020). Endocrine adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: clinical manifestations and management. Endocrine. 67(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-02119-4
Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, Kerr KM, Peters S, Larkin J (2022). Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for immune checkpoint inhibitor-related toxicities. Ann Oncol. 33(4):357-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.011
Osorio JC, Ni A, Chaft JE, Tumeh PC, Rusch V, Kris MG (2015). Antibody-mediated thyroid dysfunction during immune checkpoint blockade therapy for cancer: mechanistic insights and clinical implications. J Clin Oncol. 33(30):3400-3408. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.5291
Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD (2018). Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 378(2):158-168. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1703457
Sharma P, Allison JP (2015). The future of immune checkpoint blockade. Science. 348(6240):56-61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4174
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shem BENSALEM, Abdelaziz AMMARI, Assia BENSALEM, Amina KHODJA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.